The Debt-Equity Distinction: A Century of Policy by Accident
Our debt-heavy architecture is not a thought-out tenet of academic finance. Instead, it is substantially a function of practical circumstance: the deductibility of interest payments on corporate debt from pretax profits. That simple reality makes debt financing generally cheaper than raising equity. And while there are other reasons why businesses might want to use debt, especially the investment leverage that it provides to equity owners, the tax shield and the resulting lower “cost” of debt often tip the finance scales in favor of borrowing versus putting in one’s own capital. This bias was not part of the plan. Because there was no plan. Debt’s allure emerged not from careful deliberation about an optimal corporate capital structure at the University of Chicago, but from the exigencies of financing World War I. What began as a hastily adopted wartime measure has hardened through time to become a deeply rooted expectation. A century later, we inhabit a financial world substantially shaped by this distinction between cheaper debt and dearer equity. It is a distinction that might have had some justification at the time but now leads to corporate decisions that otherwise might not make business sense…
Read More